<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexist Magazine Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 04:48:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GeoNeo</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1347</link>
		<dc:creator>GeoNeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1347</guid>
		<description>@GMcG, that&#039;s not really what the post says (Also it&#039;s really annoying to me when people use you&#039;re instead of your... but I&#039;ll leave that alone this time). Anyway it says the ADS are suggesting plus sized women be more reserved, even ashamed of their figures. This post agrees with you that they&#039;re attractive.

Also ads depicting sexuality are fine, but ads that are sexually objectifying people, turning their bodies into lifeless objects that can be bought and sold, those ads ARENT ok. Sex is about a connection between 2 people, not 1 person and a blow up doll barbie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@GMcG, that&#8217;s not really what the post says (Also it&#8217;s really annoying to me when people use you&#8217;re instead of your&#8230; but I&#8217;ll leave that alone this time). Anyway it says the ADS are suggesting plus sized women be more reserved, even ashamed of their figures. This post agrees with you that they&#8217;re attractive.</p>
<p>Also ads depicting sexuality are fine, but ads that are sexually objectifying people, turning their bodies into lifeless objects that can be bought and sold, those ads ARENT ok. Sex is about a connection between 2 people, not 1 person and a blow up doll barbie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMcG</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>GMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>You really can&#039;t think why the models might take part in this ads?

You&#039;re post suggests that plus size girls should be more reserved and less sure of their bodies. The idea of the ad is ugly but these are incredibly attractive woman.

You shouldn&#039;t be at a loss - adverts selling object associated with sex are sexist.

And the younger models, they can take all their clothes off and pose for these images because their bodies will never be as attractive as it is now, and they (like you and me) know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really can&#8217;t think why the models might take part in this ads?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re post suggests that plus size girls should be more reserved and less sure of their bodies. The idea of the ad is ugly but these are incredibly attractive woman.</p>
<p>You shouldn&#8217;t be at a loss &#8211; adverts selling object associated with sex are sexist.</p>
<p>And the younger models, they can take all their clothes off and pose for these images because their bodies will never be as attractive as it is now, and they (like you and me) know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMcG</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1292</link>
		<dc:creator>GMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1292</guid>
		<description>We got the idea that ads depicting sexuality are wrong from a range of places and conditions.

Religion is the most obvious, but probably a scapegoat for others. Victorian times gave use ideas that we developed and hold to this day. Media hype has also created an unrealist idea of sex - a lot of peeps feel inferior to this idea and react with disapproval to all sex. And something I might also think is that people are control freaks and don&#039;t like sex going on in other peoples minds - they want to be the object of desire.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We got the idea that ads depicting sexuality are wrong from a range of places and conditions.</p>
<p>Religion is the most obvious, but probably a scapegoat for others. Victorian times gave use ideas that we developed and hold to this day. Media hype has also created an unrealist idea of sex &#8211; a lot of peeps feel inferior to this idea and react with disapproval to all sex. And something I might also think is that people are control freaks and don&#8217;t like sex going on in other peoples minds &#8211; they want to be the object of desire.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMcG</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1291</link>
		<dc:creator>GMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1291</guid>
		<description>Darren, I know damn fine that you have in your mind, scenes, images and actions far more &quot;warped&quot; than this.

You and me and every other human have been given a imagination capable for creating much weirder and scary stuff than this. I&#039;d trust you less if you hadn&#039;t used it in this manner.

I agree that buying something because of these ads is absurd, but the images aren&#039;t depraved ideas from media monsters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren, I know damn fine that you have in your mind, scenes, images and actions far more &#8220;warped&#8221; than this.</p>
<p>You and me and every other human have been given a imagination capable for creating much weirder and scary stuff than this. I&#8217;d trust you less if you hadn&#8217;t used it in this manner.</p>
<p>I agree that buying something because of these ads is absurd, but the images aren&#8217;t depraved ideas from media monsters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GMcG</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1290</link>
		<dc:creator>GMcG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 19:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1290</guid>
		<description>A lot of these ads are showing sexual imagery or promoting sexual ideas. Objectification is in the eye of the beholder.

I&#039;m big enough question ideas adverts try to promote. They don&#039;t make me think anything. They are not ready-made thoughts.

Many real-life girls create a façade to attract attention and desire (from men or anyone else). This has been the case since forever and wasn&#039;t because of adverts for beer or cigarettes. It&#039;s a human trait.

Woman are interesting, sexual, for men (and vice versa) and some of these ads are showing that and that alone. Not good for humans, but fine for shifting products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of these ads are showing sexual imagery or promoting sexual ideas. Objectification is in the eye of the beholder.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m big enough question ideas adverts try to promote. They don&#8217;t make me think anything. They are not ready-made thoughts.</p>
<p>Many real-life girls create a façade to attract attention and desire (from men or anyone else). This has been the case since forever and wasn&#8217;t because of adverts for beer or cigarettes. It&#8217;s a human trait.</p>
<p>Woman are interesting, sexual, for men (and vice versa) and some of these ads are showing that and that alone. Not good for humans, but fine for shifting products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1289</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1289</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacquelynne Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacquelynne Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>One of the first things I wondered was...why are these female models doing this?  Are they aware of how they are being presented? I mean...I&#039;m sure they&#039;d have to be in most cases.  The plus-size models doing the Fit yogurt ads...how sad is it that they would facilitate that kind of advertisement?  Is it for the money?  Do they believe in the same ads they are contributing to?  As far as the others, some women do not mind being portrayed sexually that way, but how were some of the younger ones able to do those poses with such minimal clothing?  In some cases, such things can be considered &quot;art&quot;, but the content is so explicitly sexist in a lot of them...ugh.  I&#039;m at a loss.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first things I wondered was&#8230;why are these female models doing this?  Are they aware of how they are being presented? I mean&#8230;I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;d have to be in most cases.  The plus-size models doing the Fit yogurt ads&#8230;how sad is it that they would facilitate that kind of advertisement?  Is it for the money?  Do they believe in the same ads they are contributing to?  As far as the others, some women do not mind being portrayed sexually that way, but how were some of the younger ones able to do those poses with such minimal clothing?  In some cases, such things can be considered &#8220;art&#8221;, but the content is so explicitly sexist in a lot of them&#8230;ugh.  I&#8217;m at a loss.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>And you&#039;re ok with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you&#8217;re ok with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>While I find most of these ads, in fact the majority of these ads disgusting. There are a few that seem to be taken out of context to make a point. Namely the Pear one and a few that just seem to be expressions of sexuality, in fact the American Eagle one may be a bit risque, but it is intended to sell bras, and it seems rather tame...compared to many of the others. Just an observation. I really do applaud your work compiling these, but context is key, and demographics are vital in advertising. If I were to see an ad for something to make me a bit sexier, I would probably pick it up...but the ads that are exceptionally sexualized and objectifying are just terrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I find most of these ads, in fact the majority of these ads disgusting. There are a few that seem to be taken out of context to make a point. Namely the Pear one and a few that just seem to be expressions of sexuality, in fact the American Eagle one may be a bit risque, but it is intended to sell bras, and it seems rather tame&#8230;compared to many of the others. Just an observation. I really do applaud your work compiling these, but context is key, and demographics are vital in advertising. If I were to see an ad for something to make me a bit sexier, I would probably pick it up&#8230;but the ads that are exceptionally sexualized and objectifying are just terrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassie</title>
		<link>http://stilettorevolt.com/2009/04/worlds-worst-mags/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stilettorevolt.wordpress.com/?p=440#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>Sex can certainly be artistic.  And I agree that some of these ads are artistic - I wouldn&#039;t flip out quite so much over some of them.

But all of them?  There is a difference between depicting a sexual lifestyle - the Calvin Klein ad - vs. making women into sex objects - Details, Che, Lee, and most of the other ones up there.  There is an artistic way to portray sex.  But giving people the impression that anyone - men or women - are only powerful when they have a sexy body, or offer sex to others, or can be used by sex is pretty inappropriate and sickening.  All it does is tell people - youth especially - that they need to be sexy, popular, and a flirt to be powerful/successful.  Thats it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sex can certainly be artistic.  And I agree that some of these ads are artistic &#8211; I wouldn&#8217;t flip out quite so much over some of them.</p>
<p>But all of them?  There is a difference between depicting a sexual lifestyle &#8211; the Calvin Klein ad &#8211; vs. making women into sex objects &#8211; Details, Che, Lee, and most of the other ones up there.  There is an artistic way to portray sex.  But giving people the impression that anyone &#8211; men or women &#8211; are only powerful when they have a sexy body, or offer sex to others, or can be used by sex is pretty inappropriate and sickening.  All it does is tell people &#8211; youth especially &#8211; that they need to be sexy, popular, and a flirt to be powerful/successful.  Thats it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
